Much as I dislike President Trump, his decision to attack Iran provides an opportunity for him to make a truly outstanding contribution to the world. Nuclear weapon expansion should be thwarted whether by an ally or not. Previous Presidents have inadvertently encouraged the spread of nuclear weapons. It would be tremendous if f President Trump can end Iran’s nuclear ambitions. It would be even better if he, or his successor, could leverage that into an agreement among existing nuclear powers to monitor for nuclear development, provide a short-range “cease, desist, and tear down” warning. If the country does not stand down, their nuclear research site should be destroyed militarily.
If he could stop Iran’s
funding of terrorists that would add to the significant accomplishment.
Unfortunately, President Trump's
handling of the war with Iran seems to have been deficient in the following
ways:
- He has mismanaged our
alliances resulting less international (and domestic) support for the war.
- His talk about destroying
Iran’s civilization, taking them back to the Stone Ages, and attacking
their power plants has made it harder for Iranian citizens to rise up
against the regime. Like almost
everyone in the world, they know Trump can’t be trusted.
- I suspect he has caused concern for
our Gulf allies by indicating that the USA and Iran might jointly charge
tolls for ships to pass the Strait of Hormuz and indicating that he might
make a deal with Iran that falls short of their expectations.
- He seemingly underestimated
Iran’s willingness and ability to resist, making us vulnerable because
they can build drones faster and more cheaply than we can defend against
them. (When the war started, I
cited two concerns; a) that Iranian drones could outlast our defenses and
b) that Trump was overconfident.)
- He has contributed to
the impression that he is anxious to end the war quickly, which encourages
Iranian resistance.
The media has served us poorly by stressing the rising price of gasoline but
1) They hardly mentioning the risk of nuclear war.
2) They haven't explained that China gets more than 25% of its oil from our Persian Gulf allies and 12% from Iraq, but only 14% from Iran. However, 80% to 90% of Iran's oil exports go to China. So, China is not anxious to favor Iran over the other Gulf states and Iran is unable to replace the oil China gets from those other Gulf states. The blockade is an excellent way to fight Iran.
3) They haven't explained that Iran has limited ability to store oil. Blocked from exporting oil, they will have to stop production. Some experts believe they might have to stop production in as soon as two weeks after exports stop. When oil wells are shut off, it can be difficult to resume production because of water and paraffin buildup and other potential problems. This is another reason why the blockade of Iran's exports is an effective strategy. It does not cause soldiers or civilians on either side to die (unless perhaps if Iran tries to evade the blockade). It does not destroy infrastructure either. It doesn't even expend significant munitions.
The media, and the Democrats, stoke
public reactions that encourage the Iranians to think they can outlast us.