Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Do you think my October 2016 assessment of Donald Trump was accurate?

The following excerpts of my October 16, 2016 communication about the 2016 election describe my evaluation of Donald Trump.  I've deleted wording about Hillary Clinton and some specific legislative issues, but no changes have been made to the evaluation of Trump as a prospective president.  Unfortunately my comments were correct.
 
Donald Trump is a pragmatist, which makes a Trump presidency more unpredictable.  While that leaves open the possibility that some good things might result, his intention to hire a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton is further evidence that he will not bring our country together.

Donald Trump is amazingly narcissist.  As such, he does not seem to understand the concept of truth.   When I try to understand his rampant lies, I think of the difference between someone who is amoral and someone who is immoral.   A person who is immoral knowingly does things that are wrong.  A person who is amoral does not have a way of judging right from wrong.  Trump’s lying seems similar to being amoral.  He just knows what he wants to be the case and says it.  Truth or falsehood is irrelevant to him.  That’s scary.

Trump lacks the mental discipline/stamina to stay on topic.  This is a serious stamina issue for a President.  He is also very weak at thinking before speaking.  That’s a form of discipline and perhaps mental stamina.

Trump repeatedly alienates people typically for no good reason.  He is a very poor judge of how he affects people.  This aspect of his temperament is very damaging for a President of the USA who has to bring domestic people together and also must build relationships with foreign leaders.

Although there are times when we have to stand for principles and can’t sacrifice them for compromise, I feel that we greatly need a unifier as President now. 

But Trump, as described above and with his promise to name a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton, is even less of a unifier.

Trump temperament is scary relative to foreign policy.  His intentions are unclear.  He should be able to create coherent policy but he has failed to demonstrate such ability. 

He is very sensitive to criticism and lashes out aggressively and irrationally in response.  Taking a chance on him seems really reckless.  It seems clear why people fear his finger on the nuclear button.

1 comment:

  1. Claude, your comments appear to focus on the short term and don't include long term implications.

    Whatever you think about Trump pales in comparison to decisions made by Legislative and Judicial branches of our government vis-a-vis the long term future of our county.

    Most Senators and Representatives today care about remaining in office. This overshadows debating solid, hard long decisions with a vision that our forefathers possessed.

    Truly the future of the USA is secondary to their personal wants and needs. They do not view the constitution as a litmus test of their decisions. Invariably, their decisions, while maybe helpful shout term, lead to long term challenges for our Country.

    I would be interested in your comments about 2 books released recently: "Written Out of History", by Senator Mike Lee and "Smashing the DC Monopoly" by Oklahoma Physician, Senator & Representative.

    More specifically, what do you think about a States Constitutional Amendments Convention?

    ReplyDelete